Legal Opinion

Halligan v. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This cause was heard before Leland, Judge, at November term, 1853, of the La Salle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.

This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit, brought by Halligan against the Chicago and Rock Island Railroad Company. The first three counts of the declaration alleged in substance, that the defendant, on the first of January, 1853, broke and entered two closes, the property of the plaintiff, situated in the county of La Salle, and described as the. west half of lot ten in block one hundred and fifty-two, and lot three in block sixteen, in the city of Peru, and pulled down and destroyed two houses standing thereon. The fourth count alleged, that the defendant “ on the day and year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. SeelyNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Starr v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Curtiss v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  4. Campbell v. ArnoldNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  5. Randall v. CleavelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Galt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Indianapolis, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Coastal Oil & Gas Corporation and Coastal Oil & Gas USA, L.P. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API