Legal Opinion

Smith v. Edwards

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2002No. Docket 222596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case arising from a property dispute, plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s grants of summary disposition in favor of all defendants. We affirm.

The underlying facts in this case are undisputed. Plaintiffs Charles Smith and Lois Smith (the Smiths) owned property located at a Cantaberry Court address in Livingston County. By deed dated October 19, 1992, the Smiths possessed a “30 foot wide Private Easement for Ingress, Egress, and Public Utilities” (Smith easement) across the adjacent property that intervening defendants Rita Lamport and Derek Lamport (the Lamports) now own.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HA Smith Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DecinaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ephrata Area School District v. County of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Ephrata Area School District v. County of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API