Hausermann v. Hausermann

¶ 1. Wife appeals the court’s order modifying spousal maintenance. On appeal, wife argues that the court erred in setting the date for the modification to take effect, and reducing husband’s maintenance obligation based on wife’s anticipated inheritance even though it had not yet been received and absent a demonstration that it would improve wife’s financial circumstances. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The parties were divorced in March 2006 after a long-term marriage. At the time of the divorce and continuing to the present, husband has worked as an insurance agent and earned around $200,000…