Legal Opinion

Ikard v. Minter

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided September 25, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern' District. Hosea Townsend, Judge. Action by W. H. Minter, Jr. against John M. Ikard. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGill, C. J.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered at the February, 1901, term of the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, sitting át Chickasha (Hon. Hosea Townsend, judge presiding), against the appellant, John M. Ikard, and in favor of the appellee, W. H. Minter, Jr. The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he is the owner and entitled to the possession of a certain tract of land described in the complaint; that he purchased said land from one J. E. Wright on the 25th day of November, 1899, for a valuable consideration. He also avers that he became entitled to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lucas v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Jackson ex dem. Schaick v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Vrooman v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Lockwood v. WalkerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sampson v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. McLaughlin v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Combs v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Holford v. JamesCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API