Legal Opinion

Darrell v. Joe Morris Music Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1940No. 373PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal depends upon whether the judge’s finding that Sherman and Silver did not copy the plaintiff’s composition was “clearly erroneous” under Rule 52 (a), Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The strength of the plaintiff’s case lies in the substantial identity of a se-' quence of eight notes in his song and theirs; and indeed, that hardly does justice to the similarity between the two, because the sequence reappears in each song so frequently as to constitute the greater part of each. This makes the two, when rendered, so much alike to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnstein v. Edward B. Marks Music CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Ronald H. Selle v. Barry Gibb, and Ronald H. Selle v. Barry GibbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Michael Skidmore v. Led ZeppelinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. ABKCO Music, Inc. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Cain v. Universal Pictures Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API