Crandon v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Scalia, joined by Justice O’Connor and Justice Kennedy
I agree with the Court that the Government has failed to prove that any of the petitioners violated 18 U. S. C. §209 (a), and that its claim to a common-law remedy premised upon such a violation accordingly must fail. My reasons, however, are somewhat different. I do not think that payments which are made before or after the term of federal employment are necessarily excluded from § 209(a); but I do think that payments which are neither made periodically dur*169ing the term of federal service, nor calculated with reference to periodic compensation, are excluded.
I
Subsection (a) of § 209 makes…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. MorseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.