Legal Opinion

Antell v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

This is an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, by 16 teachers to set aside, as arbitrary and capricious, an amendment to the by-laws of the Board of Education insofar as it adds to the experience requirements for the license of assistant to principal.

Prior to February, 1959 the experience requirement for the license of assistant to principal consisted of 1 ‘ five years of teaching under appointment in day school” (by-laws, § 327). On February 26,1959 section 327 of the by-laws was amended by *120adding the following: ‘ ‘ Two of said years shall have been rendered since…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Cowen v. ReavyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Sheridan v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morley v. ArricaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. De Boer v. LooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Antell v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API