Legal Opinion
Morley v. Arricale
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1985PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that determinations as to the qualifications of candidates for pedagogical positions are within the purview of the Board of Education (see, Matter of Council of Supervisory Assns. v Board of Educ., 56 Misc 2d 32, 37-38, affd 31 AD2d 34, revd on other grounds 23 NY2d 458). Absent a showing that the Board acted arbitrarily or capriciously, the court may not substitute its own judgment for the Board’s on *667matters entrusted by law to the Board’s own specialized…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Council of Supervisory Associations of Public School v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Bloomberg-Dubin v. Board of Education of City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- MATTER OF BLOOMBERG-DUBIN v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Antell v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Council of Supervisory Associations v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rubino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Palm Management Corp. v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Meltzer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.