Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1934No. 6 Div. 420PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDEESON, Chief Justice.

As a general rule, no duty rests upon the owner or occupant abutting a sidewalk to keep the same in repair, and he is not liable for defects which he did not create. Hill v. Reaves, 224 Ala. 205, 139 So. 263; 13 R. C. L. 321, § 265. But, where the abutting owner or occupant, as here, creates or establishes a driveway over or across a sidewalk for the use of his patrons or customers to go to or from his place of business, it becomes his duty to use reasonable care to see that'so much of the sidewalk so used is kept in a reasonably safe condition for pedestrians. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frierson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Alabama Steel & Wire Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Hill v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Graveman v. Wind Drift Owners' Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. City of Bessemer v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Davis v. PecorinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. City of Birmingham v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API