Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Boozer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 1984No. 402-82Published

1Concurrence

*614CLINTON, Judge,

concurring in the denial of the State’s motion for leave to file motion for rehearing.

I write only to clarify that my own understanding of “reviewable rulings of the trial court” as employed in the majority opinion on original submission, coincides with that expressed by Judge Campbell here. As was explicated in Ortega v. State, 668 S.W.2d 701, 705, n. 10 (Tex.Cr.App.1984) (Opinion on original submission):

“But once the phrase is incorporated, into the court’s instructions to the jury in such a way that the jury must find it before a verdict of guilt is authorized, Article…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ortega v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Flewellen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API