Wilkes v. Sievers
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Nutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Mandamus. The court made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
Plaintiffs are copartners and defendant Sievers is city auditor of the city of Stockton, whose duty it is to draw warrants upon the city treasurer for the payment of salaries of all city officials when due and payable; one Bert Harbin was the duly elected and qualified police clerk of said city and became indebted to plaintiffs for the common necessaries of life in the sum of $126.80, for which amount plaintiffs duly recovered judgment in the justice’s court on July 30, 1907, and said judgment is in effect and is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bangs v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Egilbert v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trow v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Kimball v. LedfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936