Legal Opinion · Dissent

Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 28, 1970No. C.D. 3958Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

BichaRdson, Judge:

I dissent from the conclusion as well as from the separate views expressed by the majority in this case. In my opinion, reliquidation of the entry at bar is void because it was done in violation of the provisions of 19 U.S.C.A., section 1315(d).

It serves no useful purpose in this litigation to comment upon the subject of whether in fact there was an established and uniform practice in the classification of Shell Alexia A oil prior to the duty-free liquidation of the subject entry, as that issue has not been presented in the protest. And it would only serve…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Westergaard, Berg-Johnsen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API