Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 22, 1911No. 463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal horn Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7073 (T. D. 30797).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal is to determine the dutiable classification of breccia under the tariff act of 1909. There is involved a question of law, no serious controversy being had as to the facts.

*71Breccia unquestionably is a species of. marble. These invoices characterize a part of this importation at least by the term “marble” with certain descriptive words added, for example, “invoice of Numi-dian marbles, variety breche sanguine.” It was agreed by all the witnesses who testified that breccia is used either with marble or independently as marble is used in interior decorations and for other purposes.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Cunard Steamship Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API