Legal Opinion

Sowles v. First Nat. Bank of St. Albans

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont

Decided May 27, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This suit was brought in a court of chancery of the state against the bank to reach property held as a part of the assets of the bank by the receiver appointed by the comptroller of the currency. The subpoena ran to the bank, and did not name the receiver, but was served upon him, and a temporary injunction was granted which would reach him. lie removed the cause into this court. The orator has moved to remand it to the state court, and that motion has now been heard. The orator insists that the suit is against the bank, and not against the receiver; and relies upon Whittemore v. Bank, 134 U.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hitz v. JenksSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Whittemore v. Amoskeag National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hot Springs Independent School Dist. No. 10 v. First Nat. Bank of Hot SpringsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API