Legal Opinion
Schlegel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for breach of a homeowner’s insurance policy, the plaintiff Robert G. Schlegel appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (LaCava, J.), dated January 13, 2000, as granted the defendant’s motion for leave to renew and, upon *517renewal, granted its prior motion to change the venue of the action from Dutchess County to Delaware County, which was denied by an order of the same court dated September 8, 1999, and denied that branch of his cross motion which was for summary judgment in his favor on the issue of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murray v. North Country InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Chenango Mutual Insurance v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Harrell v. Koppers Company, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- A.B. Medical Services, PLLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Ficic v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 2005
- Morley Maples, Inc. v. Dryden Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Morley Maples, Inc. v. Dryden Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015