Legal Opinion
State v. Hendrix
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 8, 1988No. 18510-1-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Todd Hendrix, a juvenile, appeals his conviction of public indecency, contending that the photos used in a montage presentation were impermissibly suggestive and that the evidence of identity is insufficient to support the conviction. We affirm.
Facts
Hendrix was charged by information with three counts of public indecency, contrary to RCW 9A.88.010. After a hearing, his motions to suppress the identification of his picture from a photo montage and to compel a lineup identification procedure were denied.
At trial count 1 was dismissed because it was barred by the statute of limitations.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. IldefonsoHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.