Legal Opinion

State v. Ildefonso

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1992No. 14921PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Defendant-appellant Julius H. Ildefonso (Ildefonso) appeals his conviction of failing to stop at an intersection as required by law, a violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291C-63(b). On appeal, Ildefonso contends that his conviction should be reversed on the grounds that: 1) the State’s sole witness, the citing police officer, failed to identify Ildefonso in court as the person who failed to stop at the intersection; 2) his right to be free from self-incrimination was violated when the court ordered him to step forward and identify himself during trial;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. NaeoleHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MosesHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MatiasHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ChowHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API