Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City Ice & Fuel Co. v. Stegner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1929No. 21502PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

This is an action in mandamus, and was instituted in this court by the relator to procure a writ compelling the director of buildings of the city of. Cincinnati to issue a permit for the erection of an addition to the relator’s building, heretofore used as an ice storage plant, and the installation of machinery and equipment necessary to manufacture ice for commercial use. The facts essential to a consideration of the legal questions presented may be very concisely stated.

The building now on relator’s premises was erected in 1923, since which time said building has been used by the relator…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of GlendaleOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API