Thompson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREEN, Commissioner.
Appellant, in a trial before a jury, was convicted of robbery by firearms. Punishment was assessed at twenty-two years.
The sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is not challenged. Suffice it to say that the record reflects that about 12:30 P.M. on December 23, 1972, appellant and two other males entered Bein’s Furs, a store in Corpus Christi and, by exhibiting a gun, and by threats and violence, robbed Robert Gonzales, the acting manager of Bein’s Furs, of a sum of money and two fur coats.
Appellant in his first ground of error contends that the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Pete v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Lovel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Elizaldi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.