Legal Opinion

Broadbent v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1946No. Civil Action No. 3049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

The petitioner, defendant in the above entitled cause, brought this motion under Rule 30(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to obtain an order of court terminating the taking of the deposition of one Albert B. Spaulding, whom the defendant itself had subpoenaed for the deposition to which the instant motion pertains.

The motion discloses that at the time of the taking of the deposition the plaintiff’s attorney, during cross-examination, asked the defendant’s counsel1 whether he had previously obtained a statement from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laverett v. Continental Briar Pipe Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  2. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. BurgerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. McCormick v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ross v. Cities Service Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
  2. Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API