Legal Opinion

State v. Midyette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1967No. 84PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaee, J.

In his presentation of these appeals, the defendant has disregarded the rules of this Court in respects too numerous to mention. We have, nevertheless, considered each of his assignments of error and his contentions in his brief and oral argument.

The indictment in Craven County Case No. 7534 alleges that the offenses therein charged were committed in that county. It was, therefore, the proper venue for the trial thereof. G.S. 15-134. The defendant contends in his brief that his trial and conviction in Craven County, following his trial and conviction in Pamlico County, was a violation of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API