Legal Opinion

United States v. Chisholm

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 16, 1979No. ACM 22446Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION

ORSER, Judge:

Upon original review of the record of trial in this case, we affirmed the court’s findings of guilty of four offenses involving marihuana and the sentence. United States v. Chisholm, No. 22446 (AFCMR 9 February 1979) (unpublished). Although the case was submitted on the merits and we did not specifically address the matter of court-martial jurisdiction as to two of the offenses, marihuana sales consummated off base, we were, nevertheless, satisfied the offenses were service connected.

Our decision to reconsider was based on the recent case of United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. AlefUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. McCollumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API