Legal Opinion

Anderson v. County of Meeker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by Anderson from an order of the district court for Meeker county, Powers, J., refusing a new trial of his appeal from an order of the board of county commissioners establishing “Ditch No. 3” in that county, a dismissal of the appeal having been ordered at the trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

In proceedings had conformably to the provisions of Laws 1887, c. 97, an order or judgment of the respondent board was made and filed under section 9, locating and establishing a ditch petitioned for by Soren Morton and others. From the order or judgment an appeal was taken by the appellant here, the same being authorized by section 11. The appeal was dismissed by the district court, evidently upon one or more of the three distinct grounds of dismissal, stated in the order dismissing as having been made in the respondents’ motion. These were — First, that the order or judgment was referred to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Town of Haven v. OrtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Schuster v. Supervisors of LemondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. BartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Williams v. HolmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burmeister v. GustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Bell v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Theis v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. McMillan v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API