Legal Opinion

Second Injury Fund v. Arctic Bowl

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1996No. S-7092, S-7152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is an appeal from the superior court acting as an intermediate court of appeal from a decision of the Worker’s Compensation Board. Second Injury Fund (SIF) appeals the superior court’s decision granting reimbursement from the fund to Arctic Bowl 1 and its insurer, Alaska National Insurance Company, for payments made to Johanna DeLong, a former employee of Arctic Bowl.

SIF argues that Arctic Bowl is not entitled to reimbursement from the fund because its request for reimbursement was untimely, and because it did not make 104 weeks of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Aviation Associates, Ltd. v. TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hester v. State, Public Employees' Retirement BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sallyanne M. Butts, f/k/a Sallyanne M. Decastro v. State of Alaska Department of Labor & Workforce DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API