Melrose Hills Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc. v. Norris
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge.
The defendant specified in the bill of exceptions as a part of the record: “The pleas and answers of Melrose Hills Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.” Its demurrers were not specified nor included in the record and since the term “pleas” does not embrace “demurrers,” (see Words and Phrases, Yol. 32A, p. 248 and citations), no question is presented for decision by the complaint that the “movant. . . excepts and now excepts and assigns error on the said ruling . . .” overruling its general demurrer when such demurrer was not specified as a part *506of the record or certified in the writ of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Canal Insurance Co. v. Winge Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Halpern v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Moore v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Engineered Builders, Inc. v. Lamar Nash Buick-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Linster v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- National Organic Corporation v. Southern Bag CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965