Maplebear, Inc. v. Busick
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
*99The California Arbitration Act (CAA, Code. Civ. Proc., § 1280 et seq.1 ) allows a party to an arbitration to petition the superior court to confirm, correct or vacate an arbitrator's "award," an award that must be set out in writing and "include a determination of all the questions submitted to the arbitrators the decision of which is necessary in order to determine the controversy." (§ 1283.4.) In this case, the arbitrator issued a "partial final award" determining only that the parties' arbitration agreement permits the claimant to move for class certification. The primary issue before us…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. Am. Sur. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Darby v. Sisyphian, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Just a Fluke, Inc. v. Litalien CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Kirk v. RatnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Kirk v. RatnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.