Partap v. Holder Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Rana Partap, a native and resident of India, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his claim for cancellation of removal and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition for review.
Partap contends that the BIA erred in holding that his then-unborn daughter did not constitute a qualifying relative under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). That provision requires non-permanent resident applicants for cancellation of removal to demonstrate “that removal would result…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hector Montero-Martinez Gregorio Pedro Montero-Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Romero-Ruiz v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Young Sun Shin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- MacArio Moreno-Morante v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- Javier Martinez-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- ISIDROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- Antonio Rodriguez-Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Celia Torres-Medina v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Jose Cerda Marquez v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.