Legal Opinion

Acker v. Cooley, Mayor

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1934No. 13952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

The petitioner, a resident freeholder and taxpayer of the Town of Williamston, seeks in this controversy, submitted without action under Section 668 of the Code, to have the respondents enjoined from constructing a waterworks system, on the ground that such construction, as no petition of .the freeholders asking for an election was filed, would' be illegal and unconstitutional.

It appears from the agreed statement of facts that, pursuant to- an ordinance adopted by the town council, a special election was held on May 1, 1934, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Scroggie v. Scarborough, State TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. Roach v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Enterprise Real Estate Co. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Waits v. Town of Ninety-SixSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nolletti v. NollettiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  3. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API