Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Adoption of K.P.M.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2009No. DA 08-0168Published

1DissentJustice Nelson

¶32 I dissent from the Court’s Opinion in this case because S.J.D. did not have standing to bring a petition for termination of B.J.M.’s parental rights, and because S.J.D. did not follow the required *179statutory procedure in petitioning to adopt K.P.M. I am not suggesting here that B. J.M. should be granted sole custody of K.P.M., or even that B.J.M. should be granted unlimited visitation with K.P.M., nor am I unmindful of what may be in the best interests of K.P.M. I am simply stating that B. J.M.’s fundamental right to parent K.P.M. should not be terminated without following the proper…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API