Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States of America Ex Rel. George Paxos v. Alfred T. Rundle. Appeal of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 16, 1974No. 72-1122Published

1Dissent

JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge,

with whom ALDISERT and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges, join (dissenting):

A prosecutor has a special obligation to see that justice is done, and it is his duty to refrain from improper methods which could produce a wrongful conviction. Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314 (1935); United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy, 203 F.2d 407 (3d Cir. 1955), cert. denied Maroney v. United States ex rel. Darcy, 346 U.S. 865, 74 S.Ct. 103, 98 L.Ed. 375 (1953); United States v. Nettl, 121 F.2d 927 (3d Cir. 1941). Because I believe that the prosecutor’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. Handy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. NettlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. Sebastion Della Universita.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. GHAULSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API