Legal Opinion

Dahlberg Hearing Systems, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1996No. C2-95-1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

Relator, Dahlberg Hearing Systems, Inc. (Dahlberg), seeks review of a Minnesota Tax Court order denying Dahlberg’s claim for a refund of use taxes paid. The tax court ruled that the use tax was applicable because Dahlberg “used” computer equipment in Minnesota and because sales tax was not paid on the purchase of the computer equipment. We reverse.

The parties have stipulated to the following facts. Dahlberg is a company located in Golden Valley, Minnesota that manufactures and sells hearing aids and related devices primarily through a franchise system of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Charles W. Sexton Co. v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Color-Ad Packaging, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benda v. GirardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. BCBSM, INC. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Benda v. GirardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Benda v. GirardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Custom Ag Service of Montevideo, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API