United States v. Hajduk
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION FOR FRANKS HEARING
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Defendants Albert David Hajduk (“Haj-duk”) and Luxury Wheels O.E.Plating, Inc. (“LW”) move to suppress evidence and information gathered by plaintiff United States of America (“Government”) in a criminal case against Defendants for violating federal environmental laws; or in the alternative, for a Franks hearing. The motion is fully briefed and orally argued. Defendants’ motion is DENIED, for the reasons set forth below.
I. Background
A. Regulatory Framework
LW is a privately owned company based…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- COPAR PUMICE COMPANY, INC. v. MorrisDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- United States v. SpainDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007