Legal Opinion

In Re Andreas G. Kemps

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 8, 1996No. 96-1130PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Judge.

Andreas G. Kemps appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals & Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 95-2635, dated September 28, 1995, affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1994) of all remaining claims of the patent application. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The claimed invention in this application, No. 08/070,359, is a method of removing old asphalt concrete containing a stone fraction using two steps: (1) blowing steam onto the old asphalt concrete in order to soften it and (2) pushing off a thus-softened…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re GPAC Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re Mark A. Vaeck, Wipa Chungjatupornchai and Lee McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. In Re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re ClementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. In re ZurkoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API