State v. Fort
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Justice:
Appeal from conviction of the felony offense of distribution of a controlled substance for value. 1
The prosecution of this case was the result of a “controlled buy” of heroin staged by police officers who furnished funds to an informant kept under surveillance. When the informant emerged from the premises he related having purchased heroin from a person called “Otis” and having been promptly forced by him to “shoot up” his heroin purchase before leaving. He was observed to have constricted pupils and blood oozing from a needle mark in his arm. He had no money. Thereafter, one of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BankheadUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.