Legal Opinion

State v. Fort

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1977No. 15197PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Appeal from conviction of the felony offense of distribution of a controlled substance for value. 1

The prosecution of this case was the result of a “controlled buy” of heroin staged by police officers who furnished funds to an informant kept under surveillance. When the informant emerged from the premises he related having purchased heroin from a person called “Otis” and having been promptly forced by him to “shoot up” his heroin purchase before leaving. He was observed to have constricted pupils and blood oozing from a needle mark in his arm. He had no money. Thereafter, one of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BankheadUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API