Legal Opinion

City of Camden v. Fairfield Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 2, 2007No. 26298PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice WALLER:

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court granting the City of Camden summary judgment and holding that Fairfield Electric Cooperative, Inc. has no legal authority to provide electric service to a newly constructed Lowe’s Store located in an area recently annexed by city. We affirm.

FACTS

This case involves a 12.981 acre tract of land, originally located just outside the city limits of Camden, SC, which was owned by Town and Country, Inc. In early 2002, Town and Country began negotiating to sell the property to Lowe’s for construction of a Lowe’s store. In the summer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Town of PagelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Laurens Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. City of Newberry v. Newberry Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. City of Newberry v. Newberry Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. City of Newberry v. Newberry Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API