Little v. Kellam
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
This is a bill to restrain unfair competition. The complainants are manufacturers of “Sorosis” shoes for women. The original defendant was a dealer at Albany, X. Y., in shoes manufactured by Kellam, Tilton & Co. The manufacturers have intervened and will hereafter he referred to as the defendants. They are the real parties in interest and should be so treated.
In the spring of 1896 the complainants, who have their manu-factory at Lynn, Mass., adopted, in advance of all others, the trade-name “Sorosis” to designate shoes made by them. Their shoes are of superior workmanship…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Ansehl v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Stephano Bros. v. StamatopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Bradford v. Belknap Motor Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1900
- Garrett & Co. v. A. Schmidt, Jr., & Bros. Wine Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919
- Julius Kessler & Co. v. GoldstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.