Legal Opinion

Holmberg v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1921No. Civ. No. 3907PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $358.75 alleged to be due for surgical services, hospital bills, etc., incurred and paid by the plaintiff while under treatment for injuries suffered by him while a patrolman on the police force of said city.

The date of the plaintiff’s said injuries was October 3, 1914, and he continued to suffer therefrom up to and including March 16, 1920, at which date the operation was performed and the hospital and other medical bills contracted which form the basis of the present action.

Th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deibeikis v. Link-Belt Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Schmidt v. O. K. Baking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Vanderbilt v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Arizona & N. M. Ry. Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Eichelberger v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. López Luiggi v. Muñoz MarínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
  5. Brophy v. Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API