Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Bedford v. Lacey

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1985No. 49270, 49338 to 49342Published

1ConcurrenceMarkus, J.

I would reach the same result by sustaining the first assigned error, rather than ruling that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the underlying case. In my view, the trial court did have jurisdiction, but the record does not support a contempt conviction.

The attorney’s allegedly contumacious conduct apparently consisted of one or more of the following acts:(a) his failure to appear at a scheduled hearing before another judge,(b) his participation in a one-half hour confidential discussion with his client about her prospective guilty plea, which led to her oral guilty plea,(c) his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Board of Education v. Hamilton Classroom Teachers Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Meinhard Commercial Corp. v. Spoke & Wheel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Alex N. Sill Co. v. FazioOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API