Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Doe
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Neely, Justice:
The Court granted this appeal to clarify the law of contempt in light of recent United States Supreme Court cases. This appeal presents three substantial questions with regard to the law of contempt which have not been squarely addressed by this Court for many years. The first is the extent to which the alleged invalidity of a temporary injunction may be asserted as a defense in a contempt proceeding for violation of the injunction; the second is the distinction in this jurisdiction between civil and criminal contempt and the procedural requirements necessary for the successful…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Daily Gazette Co., Inc. v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hendershot v. HendershotWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Askin v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.