Gies v. Flack
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, CONSTRUED IN PART AS A MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(1) (DOC. # 54); JUDGMENT TO ENTER ACCORDINGLY; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Frederick Gies (“Plaintiff’ or “Gies”) brings the present action against Harley E. Flack and John F. Fleischauer (“Defendants”) in their official capacities as President and Provost, respectively, of Wright State University (“WSU”). Gies seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 Ú.S.C. § 1983…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe v. Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Smith v. GradyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Ramon Bryant v. Annette Chambers-Smith, Christopher Lambert, Dana Blankenship, and Daniel AkersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026