Legal Opinion
Pasik v. State Board of Law Examiners
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*399OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur E. Blyn, J.
Petitioner pro se, by notice of amended verified petition and amended verified petition, seeks a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 and the New York Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) (Public Officers Law, § 84 etseq.) directing the respondent State Board of Law Examiners (Board) to make available to him for inspection and copying the information and documents requested in the amended verified petition, and costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney’s fees.
The petitioner sat for the bar examination of this State on February 24 and 25,1981. He was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Forsham v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fink v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc. v. KimballNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Miracle Mile Assoc v. YudelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pasik v. State Board of Law ExaminersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bensing v. LeFevreNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- New York News Inc. v. GrinkerNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Faulkner v. LeFevreNew York Supreme Court · 1988