Legal Opinion
A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Jon Husted
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2016No. 16-3746PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClay, J.
in which GIBBONS, J., joined, and SILER, J., joined in part. SILER, J. (pp. 715-17), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
The A. Philip Randolph Institute (“APRI”), the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless (“NEOCH”), and Larry Harmon (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed suit seeking to enjoin the defendant, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted (“the Secretary”), from removing the names of registered voters from Ohio’s voter rolls pursuant to the state’s so-called Supplemental Process, which Plaintiffs allege violates the National…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Speech First, Inc. v. Mark SchlisselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Husted v. A. Philip Randolph InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- American Civil Rights Union v. Brenda SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Wendi Thomas v. City of Memphis, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Bellitto v. SnipesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.