Legal Opinion
MG Altus Apache Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 30, 2013No. 11-538CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-award Bid Protest; Supplementation of the Court Record; Nonresponsibility Determination; Joint Venture; De Facto Debarment; Due Process; National Security.
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In this post-award bid protest, MG Altus Apache Company (“MG AA”) challenges its *430nonresponsibility determination and exclusion from the competition in the National Afghan Trucking (“NAT”) multiple-award procurement for trucking services in Afghanistan. MG AA alleges that the Department of the Army (“the Army”) (1) relied upon a classified “vendor vetting” rating process that illegally applied a de facto…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Draken International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sims v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Afghan Yar International Construction Company Limited v. US Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Golden It, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.