Hecker v. Micron Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
WINMILL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Micron Technology, Inc. (MTI) and Micron Electronics, Inc. (MEl). The Court has heard oral argument and the motion is at issue. Plaintiff Guy Heeker asserts that he was fraudulently induced to transfer shares of stock to facilitate a merger. After examining the entire record, the Court finds that the defendants did not commit fraud and that Heck-er’s access to a Proxy Statement gave him the accurate information he needed to properly evaluate his share transfer. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,649 Jean Lorelle Burke v. Robert E. JacobyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.