Legal Opinion

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge LEADBETTER.

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) that approved the siting and construction of a seven mile long high-voltage power line in Bucks and Lehigh Counties by PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (PPL). The order authorized PPL to begin proceedings to exercise eminent domain over SEPTA’s property, in order to secure the airspace necessary to run the power line over one of SEPTA’s rail lines.1 PPL has intervened in this appeal in support of the PUC…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairview Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clean Air Council, M.M. deMarteleire and M.S. Bomstein v. Sunoco Pipeline, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Hess v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Se Pa. Transp. Auth. v. Pub. Util. Com'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API