Legal Opinion

Walker v. Puck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1943No. 46221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

The only question in this proceeding is as to the ownership of four window frames with their covering, one windmill pump with cylinder pipe and rod, one hand pump, one pitcher-nosed pump, fifty-four steel posts, and approximately two hundred forty rods of barbed wire in rolls, awarded to plaintiff. Damages and possession of other articles than those named herein were also claimed. The court awarded only the above articles to the plaintiff, dismissed her claim for damages, and awarded the remaining property to defendant. Since plaintiff did not appeal we are concerned only with defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ottumwa Woolen Mill Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fetters Ex Rel. Fetters v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Marty v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Resnick v. City of Fort Madison, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Lamble v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API