Legal Opinion
Hauer v. Thum
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 16, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 So.2d 643 (1953)
HAUER et al.
v.
THUM.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.
October 16, 1953.
Rosin & Paderewski, Sarasota, for petitioners.
Dye & Dye, Bradenton, and George H. Harrison, Palmetta, for respondent.
HOBSON, Justice.
Respondent, Elmer A. Thum, a contractor, filed his complaint on the equity side of the Circuit Court in and for Manatee County against the petitioners Eugene M. Hauer and Julia Hauer, his wife, et al. He seeks the foreclosure of a claim for lien as provided by Chapter 84, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., against real property owned by petitioners upon which Thum had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Selz v. UnnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Wicker v. Trust Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Picture Plays Theatre Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yost v. Rieve Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Quality Roof Services, Inc. v. Intervest National BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Spector v. AhrenholzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Faber v. LandmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Malkus v. GainesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.