Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. Erie Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur G. Klein, J.

Motion by plaintiff for the addition of interest from July 21, 1953, on the sum awarded to him by the jury and for a direction that the Clerk’s minutes be amended accordingly. This action is based upon a breach of a contract of employment. It comes, therefore, within the provisions of section 480 of the Civil Practice Act but the plaintiff, moving to amend the verdict has the burden of showing that, the verdict for some good reason should be amended. As was stated in First Int. Pictures v. F. C. Pictures Corp. (262 App. Div. 21, 22): “ The court may and should amend the verdict by computing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First International Pictures, Inc. v. F. C. Pictures Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lesjac Realty Corp. v. MulhauserNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lindwall v. Talent Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API