Legal Opinion
Lesjac Realty Corp. v. Mulhauser
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.
This is a motion made pursuant to 5001 CPLR at the conclusion of the trial of this action for the allowance of interest upon the sum of $7,600 which was awarded to the plaintiff by the jury. The plaintiff sued the respective defendants upon separate and distinct causes of action. These causes may be classified as: (A) those based upon a breach of contract (B) those based upon “ reasonable value of work, labor and services rendered and performed ’ ’. The plaintiff is a real estate broker and this action was brought to recover commissions allegedly due the plaintiff from the defendants for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Prager v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance Co. of NewarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Chester v. . JumelNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- McLaughlin v. BrinckerhoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Grobe v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Quintel Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Bulk Oil (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Sun Oil Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Menendez v. Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Julien J. Studley, Inc. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Collier v. GrangerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.