Legal Opinion

Capuano v. Outlet Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 16, 1990No. 89-22-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Justice.

This case is before us on the plaintiffs’ appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant by a justice of the Superior Court. In this suit for defamation, the trial justice found that the plaintiffs are limited public figures and that as such, they failed to establish “actual malice” on the part of the defendant as required under New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). We vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Superior Court. The facts insofar as pertinent to this appeal are as follows.

The defendant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gordon v. BoylesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Outlet Communications, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  3. Giuliano v. Providence Journal CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Lett v. Providence Journal CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. Alves v. Hometown Newspapers, 2001-1030 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API